
Arizona could learn from Ohio prison strategies
In a bold and refreshing attitude, Gary Mohr, the current Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction director, has made his feelings clear about gang violence towards his staff and other prisoners. Showing a zero tolerance stand against those who dare oppose his words, he has promised isolations and removal from their open living style dormitories into the most restrictive close custody cellblocks designed for containment and control of disruptive groups or individuals. This move came as he expressed his concerns for the growing gang related violence inside his prisons. Quoting this director in a newspaper he said “"I have directed . . . every institution to begin enforcing higher penalties against inmates who are combative with staff and refuse an order to stop fighting [or] assaulting," read Mohr's Aug. 12 memo to inmates. “I cannot and will not tolerate this behavior."
On the other hand, Arizona director Charles L. Ryan has said nothing about his most recent report that shows an extreme increase of projected staff assaults for this upcoming year. Linking the two attitudes together one can see different styles and different priorities as Ohio is selling private prisons and Arizona is bidding out 5,000 more beds to the private prisons. Ohio, in efforts to reduce their prison population are using evidence based alternative sentencing while Arizona settles for a status quo and prepares for prison growth in an already busting at the seams system. In fact, the very first strategic goal for Arizona is, you guessed it, Managing Inmate Population Growth.
Nowhere in his five year plan does he address the high rate of assaults on correctional staff that has grown exponentially for the past six years. Looking closely at goal 1 which reads: To maintain effective custody and control over inmates in an environment that is safe, secure and humane it is backed up with Objective 1 which states: To safeguard the public, staff and inmates through the efficient, safe and secure operations of prisons. Showing a chart of fights between inmates and other inmates the rate is shown to be 381 in FY 05 growing at a rapid ate and expected to reach 1,675 assaults by FY 2012. This changed the rate of number of inmates involved in a fight from 1 out of 75 inmates to the projected 1 out of 23 inmates according to their graphs provided.
Certainly a significant increase in violence with no apparent end of the road for such conduct as the maximum custody units are already at capacity and being double bunked. Showing the chart of assaults on staff the rate is shown to be 149 in FY 05 climbing to a record high 410 in FY 2012. In the inmate on staff assaults the figures are even more frightening. For FY 2005 the number reported was 1 out of 36 staff were assaulted climbing to a record high of 1 out of 16 staff being assaulted today and tomorrow’s projection.
No comments:
Post a Comment