Wasted Honor -

Carl R. ToersBijns is the author of the Wasted Honor Trilogy [Wasted Honor I,II and Gorilla Justice] and his newest book From the Womb to the Tomb, the Tony Lester Story, which is a reflection of his life and his experiences as a correctional officer and a correctional administrator retiring with the rank of deputy warden in the New Mexico and Arizona correctional systems.

Carl also wrote a book on his combat experience in the Kindle book titled - Combat Medic - Men with destiny - A red cross of Valor -

Carl is considered by many a rogue expert in the field of prison security systems since leaving the profession. Carl has been involved in the design of many pilot programs related to mental health treatment, security threat groups, suicide prevention, and maximum custody operational plans including double bunking max inmates and enhancing security for staff. He invites you to read his books so you can understand and grasp the cultural and political implications and influences of these prisons. He deals with the emotions, the stress and anxiety as well as the realities faced working inside a prison. He deals with the occupational risks while elaborating on the psychological impact of both prison worker and prisoner.

His most recent book, Gorilla Justice, is an un-edited raw fictional version of realistic prison experiences and events through the eyes of an anecdotal translation of the inmate’s plight and suffering while enduring the harsh and toxic prison environment including solitary confinement.

Carl has been interviewed by numerous news stations and newspapers in Phoenix regarding the escape from the Kingman prison and other high profile media cases related to wrongful deaths and suicides inside prisons. His insights have been solicited by the ACLU, Amnesty International, and various other legal firms representing solitary confinement cases in California and Arizona. He is currently working on the STG Step Down program at Pelican Bay and has offered his own experience insights with the Center of Constitutional Rights lawyers and interns to establish a core program at the SHU units. He has personally corresponded and written with SHU prisoners to assess the living conditions and how it impacts their long term placement inside these type of units that are similar to those in Arizona Florence Eyman special management unit where Carl was a unit deputy warden for almost two years before his promotion to Deputy Warden of Operations in Safford and Eyman.

He is a strong advocate for the mentally ill and is a board member of David's Hope Inc. a non-profit advocacy group in Phoenix and also serves as a senior advisor for Law Enforcement Officers Advocates Council in Chino, California As a subject matter expert and corrections consultant, Carl has provided interviews and spoken on national and international radio talk shows e.g. BBC CBC Lou Show & TV shows as well as the Associated Press.

I use sarcasm, satire, parodies and other means to make you think!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
































































































































Friday, July 26, 2013

Arizona Prison Unions remain Quiet about Assaults


Arizona Prison Unions remain Quiet about Assaults

 

One has to wonder why the prison unions remain silent as one of their own received a near fatal beating at the hands of two violent inmates in the Kaibab Unit in Winslow. Not a word has been said by the leadership of the union that represents the majority of Arizona correctional officers as they face what is a most difficult task under very severe staffing conditions.

The union has not yet met with media or other sources to address this violent trend inside Arizona prisons as they fail to publicly denounce the current practices of putting staff in harm’s way by short staffing them at every essential post inside their prisons.

The union relies on the DOC’s investigative units to reveal what went wrong last Friday afternoon when an officer was nearly beat to death. Hospitalized and suffering from serious injuries she was luckily rescued by her fellow officers that responded just in time from giving the inmates the opportunity to kick, hit and stomp her to death. 

Because no weapons were involved, the likelihood of charges being filed are slim but if they do, it is  likely not to be prosecuted as the record is weak on such follow up actions by county attorneys who review such cases. In fact the chances of filing and getting a conviction stands about at less than a 33 per cent change of happening.

Arizona prison officials need to be sensitive to the safety concerns of staff working there. They need to address the daily shortages that puts their officers in harm’s way whenever they try to do their job and enforce the rules. Shortages impact many things; they reduce the findings of contraband due to less searches, they reduce vigilance of compliance of institutional rules and regulations and they put staff at risk because the number of officers that can respond to an emergency has been severely reduced.

Secondary, the public should be aware and concerned as well as a shortage of staff impact community safety as well. There are many officers assigned to community hospital rooms watching convicted felons at reduced staffing patterns by combining supervision of inmates even when they are not assigned to a bed together in the same room. Sometimes this entails different wings or floors as bed space is not always available side by side.

Out of facility transports are being done by officers fatigued by overtime or lack of training in such specialized duties. The fact is that whenever there is a need for an emergency transport, they find the first available officers and send them on their way without checking their certification cards or knowing their skill levels and training proficiency as they hurry the process to avoid a delay and be criticized for not doing it fast enough by administration that quarterback their arrangements the next day.

Today, violence has escalated exponentially and is out of control. The DOC’s solution to the problem is to move the inmates to a higher custody level after they attacked someone. Some have been moved out of state but regardless, nothing is being done about the rising trend of violence on staff.

This violence trend leaves the prisons tense and consequences of being targeted are higher now than ever before as there are less officers on the floor to watch these felons on what their home turf is and where their rules supersede those of the administration and officers assigned.

 

This creates a conflict that most often results in a confrontation as the seizure of contraband and other violations lead to personal conflicts at staff doing their jobs. A job that is covered under the terms of their union agreement with management that reasonable and practical work conditions should exist to keep staff safe and at less risk than what they are experiencing today.

Is it reasonable to expect some sort of backlash from the system for speaking out on staff safety? I am certain there is. Backlashes are common reactions to criticism as it is designed to discredit the one doing the criticizing as speaking out on dangerous workplace issues is not tolerated and viewed disloyal to the system that hired them.

It is predictable that most employees of the estimated 10,000 correctional officers will remain silent as will their union leadership for they have proven that in the past. They may silently or covertly encourage documenting workplace deficiencies but in a whole will not cause an uproar or argument over these dangerous conditions that exist statewide.

Never mind that staff are getting hurt and maimed on the job; never mind that medical costs are rising and creating a higher expense for the state and never mind that the inmates go unpunished for their misdeeds while incarcerated. It is all tolerable in the name of silence. .

A few years ago, the union took a membership poll and found they had no confidence in the DOC leadership and while nothing has changed for the good, nobody is concerned that work conditions have worsen and violence has risen to the point that an officer can expect to be assaulted once every three days in the year and more to come. I guess it’s fair to say that this is a tolerable number of assaults for the union as it remains quiet.

 

 

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Collateral Damage inside Arizona Prisons - the video on YouTube

Collateral Damage in Arizona Prisons


Arizona‘s prison system is suffering from collateral damage as it continues to fall into a financial abyss created by poor leadership and wasteful spending since 2009. The writings have been on the walls for many years but everybody in state government has either been looking the other way or failing to read the signs. That is with the exception of Chad Campbell, a leading Democrat lawmaker who recognized this failing performance by our prison agency leader and director, Charles L. Ryan and therefore calling for his resignation on Tuesday, July 23, 2013

State legislators, the governor and the public should not be surprised at this announcement to remove Director Ryan. It has been long coming and if your look back to the infamous Kingman prison escape, I have been calling for his resignation from that moment as he has done nothing to fix our state’s public safety issues and manage our prisons in a sound and responsible manner while bolstering the private prison industry inside our state. Today the state suffers severely from collateral damage and changes must be made immediately.

Collateral damage is politically harmful in many ways. First and most it implies urgent and serious ethical implications of not doing your job as you had sworn to do when you take the oath of office. Second it is harmful to innocents and this is a most coincidental side effect that can run a course of destruction. It basically is a statement of not doing your job with due care and commitment.

Collateral damage consists of at least four categories of failures with a doctrine that shows negligence, oblivious to the truth, malevolently knowing what wrong and reckless behavior is as you ignore these warning signs. Since taking office, the director has created an order of chaos that is not morally permissible under the rule of law and moral standards.

He has implemented a personal doctrine that has had a double effect. The first being a negative and wasteful prison system failing to perform up to legal and moral expectations as a government service and the second is the increase reliance and use of private corporate prison contractors to fill in the voids of his failing prison policies and send unlimited state funding into a hybrid governance doctrine that is without scrutiny or reviews.

One could argue that this double doctrine should be permissible but the loss of human lives, the destruction of internal personnel procedures and performance / disciplinary structures, the excessive litigation related to medical and other essential services as well as the higher costs associated with such inefficient operational methods are not feasible at a time of responsible fiscal constraints and higher taxes to run government. This is especially true when other states have demonstrated lesser spending with better prison management alternatives than Arizona has and this is highly noticeable at the budget hearings in Phoenix.

The question is whether this call for his resignation is legitimate or politically motivated. It is my trust if Governor Brewer would consciously and deliberately review his record of performance she would agree it is time for change in leadership.

Good change can bring Arizona prisons back into the spending commitments of lawmakers and the return of rule of law back to those relatives that rely on ethical decision making to keep their incarcerated relatives safe from excessive suffering, physical and mentally incurred harm and a high risk of accidental or natural caused deaths that includes suicides that rank as some of the highest in the country.
After all is said and done, our leaders must recognize that collateral damage is in no way permissible and tolerable in good government practices.