The Public Image of Corrections in Arizona - an illusory perception

The Public Image of Corrections in Arizona – an illusory perception

 

The field of Arizona corrections is not improving. The process for change remains slow and difficult, primarily because of the cultural extrapolations and perceptions that control the mindset of the use of prisons and the necessary funding simply available to expand private prisons rather than the public sector. This directly impacts correctional administrators’ ability to recruit quality employees, provide essential intensive training, encourage continuous professional development learning efforts, and, ultimately, foster professionalism.

The recent Kingman riots bring up an important question how the public perceive the image of our prison systems. A hybrid of state and private prisons, this network is interlinked so they function similar but by all standards applied, not the same. They may share policies and procedures but they differ culturally and ethically. More vitally, they differ on oversight and performance accountability factors.

There is no transparency in prison management. The facts may scare you but in all realisms, the private prisons are in better order than the public facilities and that trend is likely not to be reversed any time soon as the majority of the legislative funding has favored the private sector, neglecting the public prisons. Neglect of our state prisons has led to low morale, high misconduct and poor public safety.

One can only imagine if Kingman is such a model prison, what lurks inside the state prisons so quietly seething with tension, hatred and transgressions. Led by a former Abu Ghraib administrator of the infamous, Abu Ghraib Iraqi prison, there are innuendoes of excessive use of force and other abuses coming from the inmates who were moved from this prison to others throughout the state. Everybody remembers the scandal at the military’s Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.  

One could never imagine that such practices occur here within our own state but the reality is due to shoddy prison management styles, there are cases of gross abuse and excessive force happening quite frequently. To be fair and balanced, there are good administrators at work continuously to meet the tough and complex human-driven demands, sadly, making their individual efforts often go unnoticed or misunderstood.

Much of the public has a negative view of corrections and that is mainly based on the perception given to the public by the media. Accordingly, the practice of corrections has been publically mischaracterized and misrepresented, however, recent dismay over horrors exposed, only adds to the cabalistic mistakes. Public perceptions about who is a criminal come, in part, from television or newspapers. But the media fail to fully explore the operations of prison and frequently paint a picture that closely mirrors stereotypical views.

In my own experience as a prison consultant, I found the media to be ignorant about prison conditions, cultural awareness, accomplishments and failures. In fact, the media, in general, is oblivious to the truth as it stands although they boldly print and repeat stories often based on hearsay or non-scientific sources creating rumors and gossip along the way.

Even state leaders, legislators and elected officials are unmindful to what state prisons do and how they operate. Whenever critics like myself write them about serious and public safety concerns, they treat the information like they do spam and delete it from their files. They would rather not read the information and become aware than play the ignorant game and allow the conditions to exists and fester under their watch.

The governor, in particular is the most aware of all elected officials but rarely does a daily briefing to stay in touch what happens inside prisons. If it were one of his or her daily briefings, I suspect the culture and happenings would be much different than they really exist today. This leaves the burden to manage prisons to bureaucrats and prison administrators who are really not in touch at all with the general operational issues and only deal with crisis management or headline news topics to serve the governor’s desires to conduct damage control.

In Arizona, prisons are labeled as extravagant wasteland of unimportant significance.  The public, and some elected officials view such places a garbage bins of our own society as well as a habitation for human warehouses or more commonly called human dumping grounds. These places behind the razor wire are considered storage bins of lost souls and insignificant human cesspools with an emphasis of being another avenue to provide our society a school of criminals housed there only to become career criminals.

Prisons are not at all frequently subject to public scrutiny. An occasional media distortion in the coverage of crime, prisons, prison administration, custody, and prisoners is not common. As a result, correctional officers have become the victims of the stereotype of correctional officers as corrupt, unprofessional, abusive, and inhumane. Overwhelmingly, many correctional staff members are highly qualified, properly trained professionals.

However, incidents of mistreatment are not rare. When they do occur, corrective action is typically deliberately slow and a blame game is engaged to remove any culpability of the administrations. Prisons, like most other public institutions, are not perfect, and significant change and improvement have been tried several times over the last 15 years. The anomaly is that Arizona has failed to jump on this trend of change and has decided that the status quo is acceptable.

Arizona has failed miserable in the area of change. Their prison system has deteriorated to the lowest proficiency levels in history, the highest staff, and the worst trained officers in the southwest. This has led to more confinement lawsuits and courtroom challenges to vital prisoner health services that need to be greatly improved.

Arizona has failed to accept any national standards which have been promulgated based on best practices. Public prisons insists on the development of policies and procedures based on failures and lessons learned concepts. Some private prisons have become accredited, but the state prisons fall short or being close to accreditation standards. From a statistical view, the number staff assaults have increased, the rate of homicides and suicides have become greater than before—in fact, the likelihood of dying in a prison is substantially higher than the likelihood of dying outside a prison.

TSU – PSTD – Smoke and Fire

TSU – PSTD – Smoke and Fire =Monsters

 

Not much has been said about our military men and women coming home and becoming police officers or correctional officers and then switching back into an assault role by joining their respective emergency response teams [ERT] causing some concern about those members already filled with PTSD and other traumatizing disorders while on duty and off duty. Soldiers, Marines and other servicemen and women joining law enforcement is no anomaly. It has rather, become the general rule to follow.

Soldiers and Marines, make great cops and are hired for such duty assignments in a plentiful fashion. Having experience with combat, giant black tactical armored vehicles, chest high armor plated, M16 or other high powered weaponry, they are exposed to the blasts of roadside bombs, roof top snipers, and close quarters building to building search and destroy missions and many other skills designed for a warrior.

Today, the idea of becoming a cop or correctional officer doing their jobs of enforcing rules and regulations, armed with lethal or non-lethal weapons attracts warriors of such experience levels and should cause a concern for those employing these warriors. Given the national talent searching and soul-searching task of finding qualified candidates for police work, these warriors are accosted by private and public enforcement entities in large numbers.

Security companies are hiring warriors at a high rate and giving them key roles as first responders and other high profile parts. Enter corrections, the public and private prison exhibition arena and you are instantly taken away with the presence of assault rifles, gas masks, helmets, tactical gear, night-vision devices and countless other references to the war zone. This reflects what is commonly called a 9/11 symbolism where the presence of force and power is appropriate and, of course, this being a gung-ho, ERT /TSU / SWAT-team jamboree, self-awareness was all-pervasive.

Make no mistake, there are problems here as these heroes, warrior or whatever you want to call these PTSD laden men and women, are sophisticated people, individuals coming back from combat who know how to use their weapons and are dealing with PTSD. We have to become more aware and more cautious that there is a definite link between PTSD and violence and that such links could reveal acts that are inappropriately handled for the crime, misconducts dealt with and could create an escalation of a situation that might be viewed as combat and is overblown to the point of distortion.

There you have it in a nutshell, we are turning police / correctional officers back into soldiers to deal with non-combat situations that may be handled as actual combat due to PTSD. The insanity comes a full circle. Those who fight monsters (PTSD) inevitably change. Because of all that they see and do, they lose their innocence, and a piece of their humanity with it. If they want to survive, they begin to adopt some of the same characteristics as the monsters they fight. It is necessary. They become capable of rage, and extreme violence.

Sometimes, this blurs lines as it becomes increasingly difficult to keep the lines clear. They keep those monster tendencies locked away in a cage, deep inside waiting for a trigger to release all that emotional pent-up feelings. That monster is only allowed out to protect others, to accomplish the mission, to get the job done and how it gets done is often left up to these warriors. Not for the perverse pleasure that these warriors possessed by these monsters, feel they want to intentionally harm others. In fact, those monster tendencies cause damage...guilt, isolation, depression, PTSD.

There is a cost for visiting violence on others when you are possessed by a monster. Those who do so know one thing...The cost inflicted upon society as a whole is far greater without those who fight monsters creating a necessity that allows them to exist. That is why they join tactical special units [TSU] as they are willing to make that horrible sacrifice so that others may live peaceably.  Before you judge one of us, remember this before you speak. On the other hand, regardless how the monsters roam inside the head or the heart, it is still up to personal responsibility to accept what it does to others including yourself - PTSD is relentless in finding victims and should be addressed to avoid pitfalls of becoming the monster it is and creates in all reality. Help should be sought and treatment should be provided without labels, stigmas or stereotyping this help or assistance as a weakness, when in fact, it is quite the opposite.

Kingman Riot – Mob Mentality

What actions unite inmates as a mob?

For whatever reasons, a riot jumped off on July 1, 2015, at the ASPC Kingman Complex – by reading preliminary reports “leaked” by DOC employees, there appears to be a culture not willing to take the blame for the riot or whatever  happened during this disturbance. Governor Ducey has ordered a full probe or investigation on this matter, and we will have to wait and see what this report contains and how thorough it will be regarding the root causes of this riot. One thing is for certain; inmates unleashed an attack that was violent and well organized in the sense of unity, cooperation and targets. The reason for their involvement is yet to be determined but there are always root causes that lead to such attacks that are predominantly shared in almost every riot recorded. Another thing that was certain was the fact that there was a mob mentality present those first three days inside the Kingman prison complex – although a mob mentality doesn’t always lead to violence, this was not the case for this disturbance. Staff were the primary targets and should send a very serious message to the administration as to how the employees became the focus of this rage and destruction that took place inside this privately owned prison.

A common thread that pulls people together in unity and work them into a frenzy are issues about social injustice, treatment, freedoms, rights and victimization. When such issues boil, the riot is quite predictable as to ‘something is going to happen’ and eventually it does. A mob mentality can often also be called a ‘herd mentality’ as they unite and become one in a very large crowd. Regardless of race, color, religious or other preferences or traditions, a herd is rare inside prisons unless there is a common root value or values disrupting their own individual needs or desires thus gathering them for one common cause – change. One has to ask, what would cause inmates to defy physical violence, chemical agents, and the use of non-lethal weapons and eventually placed in isolation for the participation. One could suggest desperation is one avenue of thinking, however, there is more to the reasons why they united and defied authority and power structures and infrastructures those days of the riot. The main dialog of concern should be “exploitation of the environment.”

Before it is not mentioned anywhere else, there are artificial causes or reasons for such mob or herd mentalities. Most of the time, when inmates act what if called out-of-character, there are strong suspicions of use and abuse of drugs, homebrew alcohol, and other mind-altering substances which may have contributed to some of the violence but not entirely the blame or cause of such behaviors. The triggers serve as a means to act out and demonstrate resistance and defiance to authority and power structures which in most normal circumstances, controls the environment. There is strong suspect drugs are rampantly available and used to alter moods and stimulate ‘high’ and ‘lows’ depending on the need or addiction.

When inmates set aside race or color and demonstrate hatred and extreme disobedience or insubordination, there are factors to consider that may have ‘stoked the fire.’ Molding a like-minded mob or herd is usually pushed by leaders chanting brutality and bold risk taking behaviors. Leaders who may have collaborated or planned such a resistance plan well-ahead of the actual days of the riot. It is certain there were no race or color indifferences fueled during this riot. In fact, quite the opposite as it was staff versus inmates and that indicates another matter of concern that is very disturbing.  Another fact quickly gleaned was the absence of religious extremism with the exception of Muslims celebrating the Ramadan and engaging in violence and destruction of property for reasons yet to be determined by the main report.

One has to examine that possibility as the conditions for the riot on this specific incident were ideal and in favor of the inmates and not staff until sufficient resources arrived to retake the institution and implement control, containment and count them for accountability purposes.  It truly epitomizes what can happen when extremism and mobs collide. In fact, this incident could be a significant factor in the end of the report when all is summarized and examined.

The first report indicating 200 to 300 inmates grouping up to assault another inmate should have triggered an assessment which would have indicated a potential conflict either pending or imminently upcoming as the time passed. Omitting the details of this first trigger to the destruction of the minimum custody level dormitories since that information was not released except via photographs, it is fair to say, even with the flimsiest evidence or accusatory perceptions, their anger, frustrations and destruction was focused on property and not staff except for the initial contact to ‘chase’ the inmate who sought safety amongst the staff present and the staff were attacked.

Perhaps the most bizarre part was the fact the inmate ‘chased’ was an addictive drug user who allegedly owed a large debt and that he was subjected to peer punishment for owing this debt and was in great condition of vulnerability and risked being killed if he had not remained so close to the staff who were releasing him back into general population with a welcoming crowd gathering to meet him.  The herd leaders remain in a perpetual state of instability and vulnerability, always trying to get to the top, remain influential and letting the moods of others not cloud their judgment and thrive on inciting more actions as the mood calms down and order appears to appear. The recreation yards are breeding grounds for herd mentality. Not only is it easy for rec field users to find throngs of other individuals who share their brand of crazy, but it shields everyone under a cloak of anonymity, which gives people the freedom to let go of their social restraints.

The second trigger was an “aggressive” inmate interfering with staff and complaining about conditions that did not seem to impact him personally but did impact those inmates attending Ramadan ceremonies and waiting to eat their sunset meal after fasting all day. Whether or not this was triggered by religious reason is not unknown, however, once the chemical agents were deployed, the Ramadan inmates engaged in violent and destructive behaviors, a complete opposite expectation for the religious group to act during such ceremonious times. Having total disregard for a copious amount of staff present due to the first fight at another housing unit, this group openly and brazenly defied authority and staff presence and commenced to destroy and attack staff regardless of the command presence of special tactics groups and staff.

Roaming virtual gangs harass others in group forums while picking up supporters along the way. It leads to rude, racist, homophobic, and threatening that the harassers would never say in during ‘normal’ environmental conditions however, the strategy appears to have been premediated and preplanned thus an agenda had already formed.

Pre-Riot Conditions –

1. Holiday weekend pending
2. Low staffing
3. Weak administration
4. No “voice” for the inmates

Corrections administrators bear sole responsibility for the preparation and deployment of correctional enforcement assets. Their ability to recognize, react swiftly to unfolding events is critical – it is suggested there were poor situational assessments  and intelligence activities conducted and the reaction was limited to the amount of staff available to respond. Corrections administrators failed to meet professional standards on all levels. As a result of the MTC organization operating with a known 15 % vacancy rate and with almost one-third of their workforce inexperienced in the practice of crowd control and containment during a riot – chaos and lawlessness ensured.

It is with a great deal of certainty, MTC employees did not have the capacity to apply and enforce the majority of institutional rules and regulations which had secondary negative impact on the environment. It is also reasonable that in order to apply an arrest, detain and escort an inmate, sufficient staff had to be present to control the situation and give an appearance of control to the inmates to avoid further conflict or escalations. It is highly likely, officers were told not to enforce the rules to a point which placed them in some sort of personal danger. Therefore, they would hesitate to enforce and engage when violations occurred unless they had the “backup” required to make such an arrest safely and without further conflict.

It was likely officers received instructions to be passive in nature or behaviors by supervisory staff and management to avoid conflict and let the inmates ‘slide’ on minor report infractions. This created a sense of boldness and lawlessness that empowers them to take higher risks and become problematic in time. There are serious questions asked about the conditions of gear, equipment and essential safety equipment that would allow better hands on treatment or control mechanism to exist. If the equipment or tools provided were incompatible with the needs of the officers, they were likely discarded or not used when a need arises.

Working shorthanded and working excessive hours or overtime impacts the effectiveness and morale of the men and women in uniform. Fatigue influences morale, energy, thinking, strength, and other factors determined to be side effects of sleep deprivation which in turn results in poor decision making and controls turnover, absences, and other negative feelings including the emotions of being ‘humiliated, dejected, devalued, insulted and ignored” by the administration who don’t seem care about them as much as they do about the inmates. This created an instant “us versus them” culture and attitude whenever a supervisor or administrator was not present.

The overwhelming sentiment of officers in the MTC workforce response to the riots was lacking in many areas which were prompted for the need to call for emergency backup from local resources until the DOC emergency response team arrived from state prisons deployed 24/7 whenever such a disturbance occurs. This caused a time lapse in their ability to sustain control and prevent further physical damage to the facility as inmates roamed freely to enter and engage various areas at will. Decisions implemented by top MTC administrators and supervisors left officers in harm’s way, making them vulnerable and susceptible to more attacks. The majority of them did not get the necessary support to do their jobs effectively.

Factors for inmates to herd up or engage in a mob mentality action – Despite claims by the MTC or DOC organization that they are not failing their legal responsibilities to deliver mandatory and essential programs or services, there are few if not rare occasions a herd or mob mentality will unite for a common cause and ignore racial, ethnic and religious cultural line.

Staff harassment and abuse of inmates – abusive behaviors by staff against inmates. Abuse or harassment may include but not limited to racist and derogatory remarks. Abusive use of disciplinary sanctions and isolation. Other actions include arbitrary threats, taunting, bullying, threatening physical violence or dispersing chemical agents and ‘attitude adjustments’ out of the main line of vision. Disrespect, humiliation and degrading gestures or words add to the tension of inmates feeling belittled and abused.

Arbitrary use of isolation and failure to protect individuals from physical harm (protective custody) – inmates who are targeted arbitrarily to ‘control’ attitudes or behaviors are eventually released back into the population but not without a level of humiliation or disrespect in front of the other inmates. Locked up in isolation is punished received as a sanction for a report or in some cases, arbitrarily ordered to take the inmate ‘off the yard” to teach them a lesson in behaviors and manners. Locked up in a cell with no room for their normal movement, they depend on staff to receive their food, showers, personal hygiene, toilet paper and many other things that are vital, when denied, making it harder for them to cope in a reasonable and orderly fashion. For 23 hours a day, they are limited in space and freedom and lose their visitation privileges temporarily until sanctions are completed or the housing has been changed back to general population standards. Failure to protect charges occur whenever someone is locked up for fighting and then released upon completing their time without regard to the reason or extended liabilities involved in the fight. There are often cases of retaliation where an individual is gang stomped and sometimes killed when they return to the yard after doing their time in isolation. Pleas for protective custody are ignored and risks are increased when they are released and subject to assault or serious bodily harm.

Primary reasons for such frustrations are legitimate and validated reasons for protective custody that include nature of crime offenses [sex offenders], testimony against a co-defendant or plea bargain for lesser time or charges, former law enforcement, gang involvement, etc. – Although legitimately established and justified by historical data, many are refused initial placements, until they are seriously injured normally resulting in hospitalization or treatment of serious wounds, injuries sustained.

Delayed and inadequate medical care causes needless suffering – this is a long time grievance or discrepancy that is constantly being violated and not corrected within a reasonable time frame. Inmates feel these contractors are not performing according to the terms of their contracts with the DOC and want changes made to ensure better compliance and delivery of services mandated by law and contract.

MTC Kingman incentivizes overcrowding – Kingman, like other private prisons, contain an occupancy quota stipulating the facility will or must remain at least 90 % capacity, with extra per prisoner payment up to 115 % capacity. Kingman and MTC are the largest contract holders for one single prison complex. This is a perverse incentive to admit, house and keep as many inmates as the DOC is willing to send them and it often includes the use of housing areas not designed for living and shortens the availabilities of personal hygiene, toilets, showers and other amenities where privacy is a limited concern but the personal space is encroached as well creating tension and unsanitary conditions adding to health concerns and safety factors.

When cubicle space is reduced, property is reduced or not issued, dormitories that were never intended to hold as many have to lose encumbered space below the limits set for reasonable occupation conditions and creates a “touch” feeling that is very personal and intrusive for many who are exposed to these conditions and often results in bedding put on the floors and gymnasium space rather than designed living space.

Interference with legal activities, mail deliveries, property issues and stifling of dissent issues – interferences of essential programs and property available for the respective custody levels are often modified from policies and procedures. Shortages, restriction and hold-ups are arbitrarily done to control information flow and frequency of service when shorthanded. Delays via the inmate grievance process often ignored or delayed on purpose either arbitrarily or as a means to retaliate for other reasons. This is determined to be a course of action commonly taken to stifle the action or dissent of the inmates on various issues that include legal, healthcare, caseworker, substance abuse disciplinary etc.

Movement is restricted long delays for programming – due to staff shortages, mass movements are severely restricted even at a low security facility. This is complicated with frequent body searches and delays that often infringe of the total amount of time dedicated to programs, treatment or other authorized platforms.

Isolation from attorneys, legal services, and advocacy organizations impedes external reform efforts – Kingman is geographically remote or isolated from the larger cities creating unnecessary barriers by attorneys and advocacy organizations. Because volunteers or outside advocacy groups are having difficult times making on-time arrivals and schedules are inconsistent, this creates a stoppage or interruption when the programs are cancelled due to staffing shortages or space restrictions.

 

Private prisons obscured oversight status – the truth about what happens inside a private prison often stays secret or hidden until a riot or other type of disturbance causes a full review of conditions of confinement and causes. More than often, there is insufficient oversight and accountability and exempts the prison from normal intrusions or inspections. Oversight maintains controls over policies, rules, and regulations intended to set baselines of safe and humane treatment in prisons. Meanwhile, external oversight and accountability is frustrated by the isolation of inmates from attorneys and legal services. DOC does not impose sufficient oversight and accountability at prisons, thereby creating long term poor conditions and eventually creating population that is frustrated and angry over living / confinement conditions.

 

MTC Kingman riot - leaked documents revealed

DOC internal report leaked showed inmate aggressive in 2nd riot see link http://www.12news.com/story/news/local/arizona/2015/07/22/internal-records-details-kingman-uprisings/30500885/

Facts - Not Really Facts - How information is skewed

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/fact-check/2015/07/20/eric-meyer-private-prison-safety-fact-check/30308595/?fb_action_ids=10203425592440928&fb_action_types=og.comments

Incarceration is a powerful tool. Facing prison time can shock someone for their rest of their lives and doing time is, all is said, the consequence of breaking the law. Unfortunately, some are falsely accused of criminality but that fact is often lost in the records, until a high profile case bring back the reality that our criminal justice system is not perfect.

From the beginning, our criminal justice system is flawed. At best, it is better to be skeptical than believe everything you see or hear on TV or the movies about the courts or prison systems. However, it has become clear, there are judges, prosecutors and others pursuing false cases using man-created evidence to keep exculpatory evidence from reaching jurors.

The same process of collusion exists between the governor’s office, legislators and the chief administrator of our prison system. They all engage in some level of using unethical and bizarre methods of controlling information, people and culpable evidence from reaching the public.

I suspect the death of the Kingman officer who was targeted by the DOC as an instigator of the riot as a direct result of harsh and unkind interrogation by the criminal investigation units of the DOC.

One should not and cannot forget Correctional Officer Jon Kemp, he is the Kingman officer who committed suicide, and the story indicates he was getting the credit for triggering the riots which means he would have had to have gone through a standard DOC interview, complete with threats of prosecution and civil liability, not to mention his direct employer sanctions so prior to his suicide. Now, we may never know what was really said inside that room.

Officer Kemp was under the gun at work and directly related to the riots which Director Charles L. Ryan has already indicated short staffing as an issue, figuring the excuse would seem reasonable but doesn't that make it a workplace safety issue for all injured, on or off duty?

Their main reason or motive to hide the truth is the fact that reveals often major flaws in management and operational decision-making processes and how their infra-structures are flawed and weak in nature due to political will and corruption.

The public, in its silence, has never asked, demanded a forceful condemnation of what is happening inside of prisons. It is hard to figure out why this is that way but they [public] seem so apathetic to the prison crisis, they prefer to remain ignorant and hushed about the growing concerns and situations.

Ironically, good legislators are doing the exact same thing – silence.

The Kingman riots is a good example of prison corruption. The governor, in his wisdom to control the situation, has ordered a full probe of the riot. The extreme confidence in this process is a wasted energy flow due to the fact, Governor Ducey has asked the corrections department to investigate themselves. This gives him the confidence the end result or outcome will be a controlled determination that will exonerate his administration of any wrongdoing.

There was a serious problem in handling this matter in this manner. Although legal, it is skirting the facts that are in all reality hidden from the public and allows time to create an opportunity to conduct damage control while the investigation is ongoing.

This includes obstruction of justice methods, destroying evidence and other blatant unlawful acts to protect the guilty of any wrongdoings. This kind of cover-up does not solve any problems, it only extends it in time so it can happen again.

This leaves a lot to be desired in the communities impacted by prison crisis and situations. In other words, there will be a report issued here shortly that presents irrefutable evidence that a huge portion of whatever the real story was, to be rewritten, restructured through politically correct dialogue and freshly determined to be untrue.

Instead of taking a hard look at the problem and the evidence gathered, they sanitize their reports and exclude relevant information, which would show the flaws, be determined not needed. Keeping relevant records, documents, statements or evidence from any report altogether, is more common than anyone in government cares to admit.

One has to step back and realize what the governor and his management team have determined to do. By hiding culpable type of evidence, they are placing themselves above the law. In the wrongful process of hiding evidence, this " nicest description I have for this phenomenon is “tunnel vision” and a deliberate act to block the truth from getting outside the corruptive circle of government.

Their motives may differ but the main claim of defense for taking such drastic action is to pretend they want to preserve the “integrity of the systems” and create a “perception of the systems working as designed.” In laymen terms, this comes down to a “needs to know” basis and that circle is very tight and small.

Certainly the public does not need to be involved in such matters. Government’s purpose is to protect and serve and they protect the public by shielding them from the truth. If this alludes to the fact the director uses unethical and probably illegal means to gain wrongful conclusion in such investigations, the means justifies the end.

All is under control and nothing is harmful to those in power. It was a win-win the agency was able to obtain by hiding the truth. Remaining in the governor’s favor, this kind of “above the law” activity will most likely have no effect upon their careers, in fact, it may prolong their assignment as their demonstrated skill at damage control becomes more valued than their lack of integrity. Isn't it time to stop this madness? Who has the courage to ask the tough questions of the governor and the director?

Bueller?? Bueller??? Bueller?????