Say what I need to say when I was young

Pro-Islamic Pandering in the New World

Pro-Islamic Pandering needs damage control

 

The world is on fire and everybody has noticed it. Between the turmoil in Germany, Sweden and other European countries who opened up their borders to Syrian refugees and other Islamic preaching Muslims escaping from their own country because of civil war and other conflict, the world is rocking.

 

Whether or not this damage control is manageable is based on the spreads allowed by government to cover up the negative and brutal stories escaping from the mouths of rape and sexual assault victims. In addition to this kind of animalistic behaviors, there are increased incidents of disturbances, homicides, work disruptions and other protests against the non-Muslim world.

 

One has to wonder, how is this backdraft of President’s Obama’s will to bring a quarter of a million Muslims to the United States work out and how can we find an amicable and reasonable plan to manage the upcoming conflict and multicultural strife that will result in a civil war or political pushback from the population.

 

Damage control will consist of turning these tales of violence around and blame the victims for their provocative behaviors that triggered such acts as rape, groping and other sexual misconduct. Blaming the victim has always worked effectively in the past and put the burden on those women violated

 

Second, the government will attempt to invoke, restrict or censor some of the negative feedback of these kind of occurrences in countries now saturated with Muslim refugees and running amuck. Decisive action will include putting restrictions on social media posting, criticism or even discuss such vile attacks as they happened in Cologne Germany and Oslo Sweden.

 

This kind of behavior has spread throughout Europe and it is suspect how much longer European are willing to put up with this kind of attack on their own society and cultures.

 

Third, the government will outlaw “hate speech” or other criticism against Muslim refugees labeled as “elder women and children, asylum seekers and migrants looking to live in peace. Laws will be enforced to stifle any loud speech against such groups as already demonstrated by our own Attorney General Lynch.

 

The civilized world as we have known it to exist is now under siege by the vilest of foreign miscreants – renegade and despicable extremists of the Quran and Islam faith using their religion as the means to destroy what our world has built over the many centuries of democracy and freedom to choose their own religions.

 

It is likely the United Nations through the United States and the European Union, shall pledge support in the cooperative censorship of all criticism of Muslims everywhere. The more citizens express their fear; the more pressure will be applied on society to quell the revolution of anti-Islamic sentiments.

 

 

 

 

O.D.D. - conclusion

Defiance of Authority

 

If you have read any of my O.D.D. [oppositional defiance disorder] write-ups, then you can see how the manipulation of mental illness can be used as an evidence-based system by corporate or government sources to provide a wide continuum of intentional or unintentional abuses that may lead to suicides if pushed to the limits of capabilities and intentions

This scope of a very difficult and extensive work by various professionals in the medical and psychiatric fields should not overshadow the legitimate use of genuine psychological services and psychotropic medication to treat real mental illness.

The fact is this type of psychiatry is very useful in legitimate diagnosis or given a real and effective treatment for those who suffer of such severe mental conditions. This is written clearly to show no intent of creating misunderstandings that assert the scope of mental illness treatment is either false or bogus.

It is and can be helpful in alleviating symptoms of seriously mentally ill persons and allow people afflicted by such an illness to lead fairly normal lives that would otherwise be out of reach for them. What is important to remember and realize is how such services and treatment can be abused and misused for the wrong reasons.

Dealing with the human mind is an intricate process that can be easily tampered with or without drugs. Brainwashing is a good example as cults are formed easily by those who have the influence over others. Using medication or false mental illness diagnoses is a dangerous revelation and development to accept and understand.

Changing personality traits to reduce authority defiance is not normal but yet, under most scientific terms, not abnormal as well. One such examples cited is the instance of cased where mass murderers were prescribed psychotropic drugs before they acted out and killed many innocents.

Doctors should be held accountable for such mistreatment however, under the current law, that is not happening. On the matter of changing the mindset of those diagnosed with O.D.D. and getting them to become less resistant to authority and follow at will, the use of such malpractice is a slippery slope with very little legal consequences.

This is because most enter into the treatment voluntarily unaware of the motive behind their treatment. Since there were assessed legitimately, their treatment appears to be legitimate as well.  Whether or not this is harmful to the Freedom of Speech has not been determined yet as there are no such cases filed in the federal appeal courts or the Supreme Court to make such a ruling.

Secondly, because these individuals, scientists, professors, or others who have demonstrated an anti-authoritarian behavior towards corporate or government business, labeling them to be mentally discredits much of their words, actions and criticism as they appear to be assessed legitimately for intentional purposes – to label them with psychiatric diagnosis to slander or erase their credibility and or reduce their rejection of all authorities they have to deal with in their scope of work.

Certainly, this subject or theory is a legitimate cause to investigate or explore the process used to address anti-authoritarians in our society and question whether they are healthy or being treated illegitimately by existing authorities e.g. corporate or government related who see fit to use such a process to undermine liberty and other freedoms.

Using mental illness and chemical restraints and controls for the sake of providing a complete need for national security or other tasks that are predictably illegal or immoral to the persons diagnosed and treated to reduce their objection to such effort is a basic violation of our human and civil rights even in the name of the advance of science or national security