Wasted Honor -

Carl R. ToersBijns is the author of the Wasted Honor Trilogy [Wasted Honor I,II and Gorilla Justice] and his newest book From the Womb to the Tomb, the Tony Lester Story, which is a reflection of his life and his experiences as a correctional officer and a correctional administrator retiring with the rank of deputy warden in the New Mexico and Arizona correctional systems.

Carl also wrote a book on his combat experience in the Kindle book titled - Combat Medic - Men with destiny - A red cross of Valor -

Carl is considered by many a rogue expert in the field of prison security systems since leaving the profession. Carl has been involved in the design of many pilot programs related to mental health treatment, security threat groups, suicide prevention, and maximum custody operational plans including double bunking max inmates and enhancing security for staff. He invites you to read his books so you can understand and grasp the cultural and political implications and influences of these prisons. He deals with the emotions, the stress and anxiety as well as the realities faced working inside a prison. He deals with the occupational risks while elaborating on the psychological impact of both prison worker and prisoner.

His most recent book, Gorilla Justice, is an un-edited raw fictional version of realistic prison experiences and events through the eyes of an anecdotal translation of the inmate’s plight and suffering while enduring the harsh and toxic prison environment including solitary confinement.

Carl has been interviewed by numerous news stations and newspapers in Phoenix regarding the escape from the Kingman prison and other high profile media cases related to wrongful deaths and suicides inside prisons. His insights have been solicited by the ACLU, Amnesty International, and various other legal firms representing solitary confinement cases in California and Arizona. He is currently working on the STG Step Down program at Pelican Bay and has offered his own experience insights with the Center of Constitutional Rights lawyers and interns to establish a core program at the SHU units. He has personally corresponded and written with SHU prisoners to assess the living conditions and how it impacts their long term placement inside these type of units that are similar to those in Arizona Florence Eyman special management unit where Carl was a unit deputy warden for almost two years before his promotion to Deputy Warden of Operations in Safford and Eyman.

He is a strong advocate for the mentally ill and is a board member of David's Hope Inc. a non-profit advocacy group in Phoenix and also serves as a senior advisor for Law Enforcement Officers Advocates Council in Chino, California As a subject matter expert and corrections consultant, Carl has provided interviews and spoken on national and international radio talk shows e.g. BBC CBC Lou Show & TV shows as well as the Associated Press.

I use sarcasm, satire, parodies and other means to make you think!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
































































































































Monday, January 24, 2011

Tacit Approval

Merriam Webster defines tacit approval as “expressed or carried on without words or speech - implied or indicated (as by an act or by silence) but not actually expressed. One must ask why these words are so important when implemented into a strategic plan or mission. The impact of such conduct determines how a set goal may ultimately change the direction or intent of legitimate goals and objectives designed to facilitate an operation within organizations or public service agencies. Putting examples towards this concept will reveal how destructive such ambiguous or vague direction alters the behaviors and ethical conduct of those held accountable for desired productive and results.

Within any military or paramilitary organization, tacit approval leads to misconceptions and corruption as the various acts or silence creates a culture that thrives on the concept of Colin Powell’s quote “You don't know what you can get away with until you try.” This type of unauthorized but yet condoned flexibility build into a management concept or strategic plan may ultimately weaken the ability to be successful as you inject personal opinions, variations and principles into a directive that has been mutated from the original design or intention. Conceptually wrong, the presence of such a potentially poisonous management principle allows corruption to foster, unethical conduct to be ignored and wasted resources to be spent on activities or programs not contained within the original design or prospect.

Tacit approval can break or create cultures and be used to sabotage the establishment of one. It can provide conflict and break down the work force and create dissention, discord and hatred if injected by the right people at the right levels of the organization. This poison can destroy every effort to perform at expectable levels and create a division that fosters fear and intimidation. The key to minimizing this type of approval is to hold each and every person employed by the agency or organization to their job description and ultimately hold them accountable for specific objectives attained and through a pre-approved method not subject to alterations unless brought to the table for conference and unanimous approval by all decision makers. Realizing that this type of action could be a very effective staff method for those wishing to sabotage a program or direction, it must be viewed through a microscope by competent and free thinking individuals or committees. Free from undue duress or influence, approvals for alternatives to the original design must carry with them a validation of evidence based results or content that can be measured and tracked for flaws and improvements.

The reason so many agencies have inspector general positions are to conduct such a review on many matters that pass through their office. These would focus on ethical and legal matters more than anything else. On another level, an local internal coping system must be established and adhered to in addressing all internal alterations or suggestions that deviate from the original proposal or plan. Each administrator must be held accountable for their group of supervisors and maintain a tracking system to illustrate upon demand, actions taken according to the plan and how they were implemented meeting both desired objectives and time frames.
Without oversight of the quality control of any strategic plan or desired objective outcome, the potential for failure is multiplied for every instance where the element of tacit approval to make a change or decision that drifts away from the original intent. Not suggesting micro managing the elements of the workplace, there can be checkpoints of accountability along the way to reaching the summit of the plan and make the appropriate changes based on the original intent or design to accomplish a certain task or goal. Rather than using tacit approval to make the change, it is strongly recommended that those same recommendations are brought forth to the proper authority to bless such a change as it is productive to their arrangement and goals contained within the strategic plan.

No comments:

Post a Comment