This old adage that silence is golden
is very much exaggerated if you ask someone that relies on feedback
to validate a position or thought or even a political stand on some
moral issues that impact our communities or society in some form or
another. This viewpoint was worthy of me giving it another thought
and determine whether silence is indeed golden or a mark of cowardice
in mankind. It is often perceived to be a sign of being “yellow”
and given a negative overtone that can't be defended at times.
How to you remain silent when the
danger is imminent and is needed to preserve life? How do you justify
your silence if your words may mean the difference between right and
wrong? It all comes down to your own conscience and your ability to
control your tongue when it it time to speak or say nothing at all.
Thinking the tongue is only capable of speaking evil often justifies
not speaking at all since the tongue has been known to whispering
rumors, gossip, backbiting, lying, slandering and other negative
behaviors or actions that may cause a liability of personal
responsibility to be invoked.
Thus it could be understood why silence
can be golden. However, exploring the other side of it being
cowardice, we find this action of remaining silent in the face of
danger, challenges or struggles as a sign of weakness and
unwillingness to speak out to defend one self or others. Under what
conditions is it proper to speak out and be proclaimed courageous and
brave under such circumstances.
Treading the grave issues and problems
facing society and workplaces today, it has become most difficult to
speak out for fear of reprisals or retaliations that are protected by
rule of law in some cases but left unprotected in many more. One
should not merely speak out and warn others of dangers or
difficulties just because they are afraid or fear others may be hurt.
It must be done because of the values between doing the right thing
and the wrong things in such circumstances.
Additionally one must not be silence
because they fear condemnation, rebuke of their words or errors in
their delivery . Breaking the silence should be prompted because
rather than remaining silent, they chose to warn others of dangers or
difficulties by telling what they believe to be the truth or their
role in this particular situation demanded it was their duty to speak
out and not shun their role responsibility as well as the trust put
into them by others around them. Yet when it all said and done, there
are many today are remaining silent when circumstances and conditions
demand that they speak up.
What other options are there? Well you
can become apathetic to the problems, or a fence sitter or the
compromising individual that discards their personal responsibilities
and refuse to carry the load or accept the obligation to help,
support or build up others and encourage change or other actions that
are righteous in content but carry condemnation with actions by the
opposition or others not in agreement with your values or direction.
Hence it still might come down to whether speaking up or remaining
silent is a characterization of cowardice and not of courage for such
person lends strength to the forces of evil and by failing to oppose
can be considered and counted as the enemy as well for all practical
purposes.
No comments:
Post a Comment