Where did the “good morality” go and how are your ethics?

Wasted Honor -

Carl R. ToersBijns is the author of the Wasted Honor Trilogy [Wasted Honor I,II and Gorilla Justice] and his newest book From the Womb to the Tomb, the Tony Lester Story, which is a reflection of his life and his experiences as a correctional officer and a correctional administrator retiring with the rank of deputy warden in the New Mexico and Arizona correctional systems.

Carl also wrote a book on his combat experience in the Kindle book titled - Combat Medic - Men with destiny - A red cross of Valor -

Carl is considered by many a rogue expert in the field of prison security systems since leaving the profession. Carl has been involved in the design of many pilot programs related to mental health treatment, security threat groups, suicide prevention, and maximum custody operational plans including double bunking max inmates and enhancing security for staff. He invites you to read his books so you can understand and grasp the cultural and political implications and influences of these prisons. He deals with the emotions, the stress and anxiety as well as the realities faced working inside a prison. He deals with the occupational risks while elaborating on the psychological impact of both prison worker and prisoner.

His most recent book, Gorilla Justice, is an un-edited raw fictional version of realistic prison experiences and events through the eyes of an anecdotal translation of the inmate’s plight and suffering while enduring the harsh and toxic prison environment including solitary confinement.

Carl has been interviewed by numerous news stations and newspapers in Phoenix regarding the escape from the Kingman prison and other high profile media cases related to wrongful deaths and suicides inside prisons. His insights have been solicited by the ACLU, Amnesty International, and various other legal firms representing solitary confinement cases in California and Arizona. He is currently working on the STG Step Down program at Pelican Bay and has offered his own experience insights with the Center of Constitutional Rights lawyers and interns to establish a core program at the SHU units. He has personally corresponded and written with SHU prisoners to assess the living conditions and how it impacts their long term placement inside these type of units that are similar to those in Arizona Florence Eyman special management unit where Carl was a unit deputy warden for almost two years before his promotion to Deputy Warden of Operations in Safford and Eyman.

He is a strong advocate for the mentally ill and is a board member of David's Hope Inc. a non-profit advocacy group in Phoenix and also serves as a senior advisor for Law Enforcement Officers Advocates Council in Chino, California As a subject matter expert and corrections consultant, Carl has provided interviews and spoken on national and international radio talk shows e.g. BBC CBC Lou Show & TV shows as well as the Associated Press.

I use sarcasm, satire, parodies and other means to make you think!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Friday, January 18, 2019

Where did the “good morality” go and how are your ethics?

Let me first begin by saying that the existence of a “good morality” is rotting in our society at a hastened pace that will find us all in deep trouble sooner than later. Nowadays, it is becoming much harder to find someone with a morally good heart, mind, and soul. Don’t misunderstand me when I say this. It will vary where you live, work or play. The rules are applied differently in many cases based on a culture, group or religion’s consciousness and codes.

To keep the term simple and easily understood, I shall define morality as a set of standards, behavioral or physical, to determine the difference between right and wrong. In addition to behavior or actions, it sets an expected level of what is proper and acceptable as well as what is improper and unacceptable.

Sounds simple enough but in given cultures, groups and religions there are still standards that are determined to be good or bad but that are in conflict of one group to the other. In other words, what is good or bad in one’s eye or mind, can be contrary to the beliefs and expectations of others.

The most common question asked is, “what does it take to be a morally good person”? speaking from a universal perspective, it becomes very confusing from the start. Most of us are raised through the influences of the Bible and understand and accept the fact that we are all subject to sin and sinful conduct. How we perceive the importance of following the “golden rule” is basically the roots of our mannerism.

We have and will continue to be, far short from perfect, and have sinned as well as fallen short of the glory of the scriptures. Sinfulness is falling or failing to give in to the temptation of wrongdoings. Using the Ten Commandments as a template for good moral behavior, we can read and understand the words “‘thou shall not steal.”

Although the moral code is more than ten rules, we must accept the fact that many of us rarely follow these ten rules as it stands. We have become creatures of political correctness and see or perceive the word steal to mean to take something from someone else. On the other hand, if you remain a practical and sensible person, you could understand that stealing is more than taking property or materialistic things from people without their permission or consent. It may also include taking their time, their emotional investments in life and so on.

Can someone or even myself, still be morally good despite the fact we (I) cannot keep up with following the moral compass code 24/7 of our lives? Is it a matter of tolerance or intolerance that makes the difference?

Can a man or woman be sinful, yet still morally good? We know and accept the fact that we are sinful, and we know and practice the fact that we are imperfect so where does it start and end? Do these imperfections disallow you to drift from being morally good or can a person stay morally good though imperfect? \

One could say that a condition of such a situation is whether or not, the person tries his or her very best to follow and quest the standards of good that they know and that to do so with all their strength is good enough to remain morally good. In other words, is having the free will and being able to choose what is good or better sufficient to be morally good. To the opposing view if you are able to choose what is bad for you, does that corrupt your morally good? In all reality, what is good for some, is bad for others as their value systems are much different growing up.

I could use the logic or reasoning that man is born imperfect but not immoral and if his or her choice is to be better morally, through minimized thoughts and actions, then he or she chooses to be morally good. Free will is used discretionary and for the good of the situation based on the guidance of his or her conscience or moral compass.

Morality is refined based on how man uses free will. How a person decides and acts based on the standards of goodness, while deferring bad or evil thoughts, intentions, speech or actions, and then seeks help to overcome temptations, he may not be perfect all the time, but he is trying to pursue perfect goodness most of the time. If this person spends most of his or her life manifesting goodness, then it may be reasonable to claim him or her to be a morally good person.

Taking into considerations of standards across some cultures, groups, and religions, we can commonly accept a concept of the common good and morally bad standards. It’s what we call ‘universal morals” that include love, peace, the value of life, justice, and other good deeds such as charity and kindness.

In this same concept, we see the deeds that cause violations of such moral standards to be a twisted version of morality that is evil in nature. An example of a twisted evil standard is when a code, tradition or custom engage an act that is zealously believed to be “morally right” according to their beliefs but at the end of the day, the morally right know in truth that such practice or standard is evil in nature. Thus, this is a fallacy or a lie they choose to live rather than choose the path of goodness.

If we allow these evilly twisted standards to exist and flourish what will be the face of the morally good? Will there be more immorality or wickedness than goodness? To what extent do these values change our lives, civilization or world values? What are the consequences of such immoral acts justified by the application of codes, customs or traditions to alter the goodness of these acts?

Watching the consciousness of the erosion of the good moral values or standards that we once embraced and used to clarify what is good and sound judgment and what is bad and poor judgment has come upon us. As a civilization, a culture, group or religion, we must decide what are permissible acts against what is unacceptable behavior. It is true that the entertainment sector, the movies, and televisions, as well as social media, has shifted our moral compass to some degree but how far you allow it to be extended is your responsibility.

For your own perspective on this matter, you have to ask yourself, are your standards of morality? Is yours the face of a ‘morally good person’ or has your ethics and standards been altered or corrupted in finding itself inverted in dramatic new values given for the future?