Arizona prisons are hinged in a very perilous state of affairs under the current leadership of the director appointed by the governor. If it is one thing that has been clearly demonstrated time after time is the lack of consistency this prison system has failed to perform even its most rudimentary functions of all correctional practices, keep staff safe and prevent escapes, assaults and violence down inside prisons.
Of course, we can’t blame their failures entirely on the director as he must have help in gaining such an ill reputed standing of being incompetent and negligent in the manner his upper echelon staff performs their duties as outlined within the agency policies and procedures. No doubt, Arizona prisons are not one of the easiest prisons to manage but before the arrival of the current director and those appointments he has made since taking the reigns of the bureaucracy he has failed the citizens miserably in performance and expectations more so than in the past.
Running no doubt the most narrow-minded and inhumane prisons in this country, its current organizational practices range right up there with medieval operations and Abu Ghraib mentalities. Even the most routine events or tasks are compromised by failures to act properly and inflicting needless harm on prisoners that are at the mercy of the failed supervisors and administrators. Officers are left to fend for themselves as they get no assistance or guidance from managers or administrators interested in only two things as directed by their boss; to prevent escapes and to contain any internal damage with fear and retaliatory management methods that reflect serious issues inside a prison setting.
For example, in the Arizona Department of Corrections, an employee has an 80 % chance of being disciplined and found guilty of charges pressed without due process or conclusive evidence or allowances for mitigating circumstances. On the other hand, an inmate that assaults an officer has a 77 % chance of getting away with a physical attack on an employee as the agency has only pressed charges in 23 % of assaults on staff that occurs on the average of 1 per every 3 days of the year. This heavy hand on disciplining staff has resulted in poor morale and poor performance that contributes to the many operational failures incurred in the past two and a half years. Recent data gathered illustrating a contributing cause to this negative culture is the pervasiveness of the “blame” factor more than the “mistake” factor. This shows that operational standards are not followed because of poor executive and managerial oversight and accountability. Lapses in security, high levels of staff injuries and illness, absence of proper training and abuse of its employees are evident and not addressed by any of those in a position to manage change of these shortcomings. Employees are coming to work as they are assigned by thin rosters carrying with them additional stress and anxiety as the “statistics reveal the full depth of the department's apathy towards officers injured by inmates in the line of duty. In addition to losing benefits at six months, facing termination, being ignored by your administration after your sacrifice, and suffering physically and mentally.” In summary of these matters, there are other tangible factors not yet listed or explained that includes ignoring fair labor standards, equal opportunity laws, disability requirements, labor safety standards and many more that include a flawed fabric and methodology to work in. [1]
Data published by a well known retired correctional administrator reflected a very discerning fact that impacts the wellness and morale of every correctional employee that works inside a prison. “Not only do you face permanent injury, disfigurement, loss of income, and the stress on your family life that fighting the Workman's Compensation system entails, you now know that the inmate(s) who hurt you have a less than 20% chance of being convicted of the crime. Actually, the last three years have been better than 20%, but 2006 and this year's statistics bring the average down. Say, a 23% chance of conviction, just to be fair to ADC and CIU.” [1]
This negative culture breeds contempt for orderly procedures, abuse of prisoners, neglect and attention to detail matters concerning inmate movement, counts, escapes, etc. their investigative tools are biased and poorly implemented and it is staff rather than the prisoner these investigators focus on when something goes wrong. Until it was brought to the director’s attention, a culture to “punish staff” existed that has somewhat backed off once the practice was revealed. Currently there are multiple issues at hand being totally ignored as another catastrophe such as the Lewis hostage situation is brewing inside Arizona prisons and nobody is paying attention to the smoke signals being sent out by those who have been victimized by the system.
Sources:
[1] www.thunderrolls.net
No comments:
Post a Comment